🔍 Vibe Check Review

Context

PR #156 adds API key authentication to /search requests and implements centralized rate-limiting with Retry-After header support.

Codebase Patterns I Verified

• Import patterns: Checked existing from library_manager.* imports in app.py (lines 46-109)
• Error handling: No existing @app.errorhandler decorators in current code
• Rate limiting: Existing pattern uses inline retry logic with Retry-After header (app.py:3057-3066)
• API key usage: API key passed via headers dict: {"X-API-Key": api_key} (bookdb.py:144)
• Module structure: Checked library_manager/ directory - no feedback.py module exists

✅ Good

• Centralized rate limit logic - handle_rate_limit_response() eliminates duplicated retry code across 3+ locations
• Consistent auth headers - get_signed_headers() + X-API-Key pattern used across all endpoints
• Client-side UX - JavaScript handles 429 responses with countdown display and toast notifications
• Exponential backoff - Falls back to 30 * (2 ** retry_count) when Retry-After header is missing
• Circuit breaker integration - Rate limit handler respects existing circuit breaker state

🚨 Issues Found

📋 Scope Verification

Scope Status: SCOPE_PARTIAL

Critical Missing Pieces:

1. library_manager/feedback.py module doesn't exist - code will crash
2. handle_rate_limit_response() function missing from rate_limiter.py
3. Client-side debouncing not implemented (Issue feat: Add client-side rate limiting and Retry-After support #154 explicitly requests this)
4. Inconsistent application - some endpoints migrated, others still use old logic

📝 Documentation Check

CHANGELOG.md: ❌ MISSING - This is a fix: PR addressing two bugs (#154, #155). CHANGELOG.md should be updated with entries explaining:

• Fixed: API key now sent on all Skaldleita endpoints including /search
• Fixed: Rate limit responses now display retry countdown to users

🎯 Verdict

REQUEST_CHANGES

Blocking Issues:

1. CRITICAL - Missing library_manager/feedback.py module - code will crash on import
2. CRITICAL - handle_rate_limit_response() function not in actual file (only in diff)
3. HIGH - API key headers built INSIDE try block, can fail silently
4. HIGH - Inconsistent migration - /match endpoint not updated

Required Fixes:

• Either create library_manager/feedback.py OR remove all feedback imports/calls (8 locations)
• Verify handle_rate_limit_response() exists in rate_limiter.py on PR branch
• Move header building outside try block and merge with get_signed_headers()
• Migrate bookdb.py /match endpoint to use new rate limit handler
• Update CHANGELOG.md with fix descriptions
• Consider adding client-side debouncing (Issue feat: Add client-side rate limiting and Retry-After support #154 requirement)

Non-Blocking Recommendations:

• Document why fingerprint endpoints don't retry on 429
• Standardize variable naming (sl_api_key vs api_key)
• Add fallback for missing showToast function

🔍 Vibe Check Review

Context

PR #156 fixes API key authentication missing on /search endpoints and implements centralized rate-limiting with server-provided Retry-After support.

Codebase Patterns I Verified

• API key pattern: Existing code uses headers={"X-API-Key": api_key} (bookdb.py:144)
• Signed headers pattern: get_signed_headers() returns dict with User-Agent, X-LM-Signature, X-LM-Timestamp (bookdb.py:64-82)
• Rate limiting: Current code has inline retry logic scattered across files (app.py:3057-3066, bookdb.py:148-171)
• Error handling: Uses logger.info/warning/debug, no custom exception classes
• Type hints: Not used in this codebase (checked multiple provider files)

✅ Good

• Fixes root cause: Adds API key header to all /search requests (app.py:3034, 3043; app.py:10951, 10953)
• Centralized logic: New handle_rate_limit_response() eliminates duplicate retry code across 3 files
• Exponential backoff: Falls back to 30 * (2 ** retry_count) when Retry-After header missing (rate_limiter.py:309)
• Circuit breaker integration: Respects existing circuit breaker state (rate_limiter.py:292-295)
• User feedback: JavaScript displays retry countdown in UI (templates/:365-367)
• Consistent header building: Uses get_signed_headers() + API key pattern across all endpoints

🚨 Issues Found

📋 Scope Verification

Scope Status: SCOPE_PARTIAL

What's Missing from #154:

• No client-side debouncing (e.g., 500ms delay between keystrokes)
• No request queue/cancellation (multiple rapid clicks still send multiple requests)
• Issue description says "debounce rapid requests" - only server-side backoff is implemented

📝 Documentation Check

CHANGELOG.md: ❌ MISSING

This is a fix: PR addressing bugs #154 and #155. CHANGELOG.md should be updated with:

## [0.9.0-beta.XXX] - 2026-02-XX

### Fixed

- **Issue #155: API key not sent on /search requests** - All Skaldleita API endpoints now include authentication headers. Previously GET /search requests were missing the X-API-Key header, causing 403 Forbidden errors.
- **Issue #154: Rate limit handling** - Server 429 responses now display retry countdown to users with toast notifications. Backend respects Retry-After header with exponential backoff fallback.

🎯 Verdict

REQUEST_CHANGES

Required Fixes:

1. HIGH - Move header building outside try block (app.py:3031-3034 before line 3027)
2. MEDIUM - Merge with get_signed_headers() to include X-LM-Signature (app.py:3034)
3. CHANGELOG - Add entries for feat: Add client-side rate limiting and Retry-After support #154 and fix: API key not sent on /search requests #155

Recommended Fixes:
4. Migrate bookdb.py /match endpoint to use handle_rate_limit_response() (consistency)
5. Document why fingerprint endpoints don't retry on 429
6. Standardize variable naming (remove sl_ prefix OR use everywhere)
7. Define showToast() function or add console.warn fallback

About Scope:

• Issue fix: API key not sent on /search requests #155 is fully addressed ✅
• Issue feat: Add client-side rate limiting and Retry-After support #154 is partially addressed ⚠️ - server-side works, but client-side debouncing not implemented. This could be follow-up work if user is satisfied with current server-side improvements.

🔍 Vibe Check Review

Context

This PR fixes API key authentication issues on /search requests (#155) and implements centralized rate limiting with exponential backoff (#154).

Codebase Patterns I Verified

• Logging: Project uses logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) pattern consistently
• Error handling: Uses except Exception as e with logging, not bare except
• Type hints: Mixed usage - fingerprint.py has comprehensive type hints (e.g., -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]), but rate_limiter.py and bookdb.py don't use them consistently
• Rate limiting: Existing pattern in rate_limiter.py uses record_api_failure() and record_api_success() for circuit breaker management
• API calls: Existing code shows headers passed via dict, timeouts always specified

✅ Good

• Centralized rate limit handling - The new handle_rate_limit_response() function eliminates duplicate code across providers
• Exponential backoff - Implements proper 30s/60s/120s progression with 5-min cap
• Retry-After parsing - Correctly parses server response and respects the header
• Circuit breaker integration - Calls record_api_failure() and checks circuit state before retrying
• Frontend feedback - Users get clear "rate limited" messages with retry countdown
• API key added consistently - All search endpoints now include X-API-Key header
• CHANGELOG updated - Both issues properly documented

🚨 Issues Found

📋 Scope Verification

Scope Status: SCOPE_OK

📝 Documentation Check

• CHANGELOG.md: ✅ Updated - Both issues documented with technical details
• README.md: N/A - No user-visible features requiring README update

🎯 Verdict

REQUEST_CHANGES

Critical issue to fix:

1. Verify bookdb.py changes - The diff shows old rate limit code (lines 149-171) should be REPLACED with the new handle_rate_limit_response() call, but I can only see the old code in the current file. This suggests either:

   • The PR branch correctly makes this change but I'm reviewing against develop (most likely)
   • The PR is incomplete and both old and new code exist (would cause duplicate retry logic)

   Action required: Confirm the PR branch actually removes the old manual retry code in search_bookdb() and replaces it with the centralized function as shown in diff lines 199-210.

Recommended improvements:
2. Add type hints to handle_rate_limit_response() for consistency with fingerprint.py
3. Add clarifying comment in fingerprint.py explaining why rate limit responses are logged but not retried (intentional "fail fast" for supplementary endpoints)

🔍 Vibe Check Review

Context

PR #156 fixes missing API key authentication on /search requests (Issue #155) and implements centralized rate limit handling with exponential backoff (Issue #154).

Codebase Patterns I Verified

• Logging: Uses logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) pattern consistently
• Error handling: Uses except Exception as e: with logging (checked providers/*.py)
• Secret management: Uses load_secrets() from library_manager/config.py
• Type hints: Not consistently used on internal functions (per existing codebase)
• Rate limiting: Existing code already uses rate_limit_wait() pattern

✅ Good

• Comprehensive fix: Addresses both Issue fix: API key not sent on /search requests #155 (missing API key) and Issue feat: Add client-side rate limiting and Retry-After support #154 (rate limit handling) properly
• Code deduplication: Excellent refactoring - consolidated duplicate rate limit logic from bookdb.py and fingerprint.py into reusable handle_rate_limit_response() function
• Exponential backoff: Proper implementation with 30s/60s/120s progression, respects server's Retry-After header
• Circuit breaker integration: Properly calls record_api_failure() to update circuit breaker state
• Frontend feedback: Added rate limit warnings to library.html, queue.html, and history.html with countdown timers
• Documentation: CHANGELOG.md properly updated with clear descriptions of both fixes
• Import hygiene: Properly exports new functions via __all__ in both rate_limiter.py and init.py

🚨 Issues Found

📋 Scope Verification

Scope Status: SCOPE_OK - Both issues fully addressed with proper implementation

📝 Documentation Check

• CHANGELOG.md: ✅ Updated with clear descriptions of both fixes
• README.md: ✅ Updated version badge to 0.9.0-beta.126
• Version bump: ✅ Correctly incremented in app.py

🎯 Verdict

REQUEST_CHANGES - Fix these critical issues before merge:

1. CRITICAL: Add missing import in app.py - load_secrets() is called but not imported (lines 3040, 10951)
2. RECOMMENDED: Add error handling around load_secrets() calls to prevent crashes on malformed config

The core implementation is excellent - great refactoring and proper handling of both issues. However, the missing import will cause an immediate NameError crash when these code paths are executed. This must be fixed before shipping.

After fixing the import, this is a solid PR that properly addresses both linked issues with good code quality.

🔍 Vibe Check Review

Context

PR #156 addresses two issues: (1) missing API key headers on /search requests causing 403 errors, and (2) implementing centralized rate limit handling with exponential backoff, circuit breaker integration, and frontend user feedback.

Codebase Patterns I Verified

• Error Handling: Project uses try/except Exception as e with logging (verified in bookdb.py, fingerprint.py, ollama.py)
• Type Hints: Used on functions in fingerprint.py and isbn_lookup.py but not consistently across all modules
• Logging: Uses logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) pattern throughout
• Rate Limiting: Existing pattern in bookdb.py uses manual retry logic with Retry-After parsing
• Documentation: CHANGELOG.md gets updated for all notable changes

✅ Good

• Centralized rate limit handling - handle_rate_limit_response() eliminates duplicate code across bookdb.py, fingerprint.py, and app.py
• Exponential backoff - Proper 30s/60s/120s progression prevents hammering the API
• Circuit breaker integration - Calls record_api_failure() to prevent runaway retry loops
• Frontend feedback - All three templates (library, queue, history) show rate limit messages with retry countdown
• Comprehensive scope - Addresses both issues feat: Add client-side rate limiting and Retry-After support #154 and fix: API key not sent on /search requests #155 completely
• Auth headers added - All /search endpoints now include X-API-Key header
• Documentation - CHANGELOG.md properly updated with issue references

🚨 Issues Found

📋 Scope Verification

Scope Status: SCOPE_OK - Both issues fully addressed

📝 Documentation Check

• CHANGELOG.md: ✅ Updated (lines 9-19) with proper issue references and detailed descriptions
• README.md: ✅ Updated version badge from 0.9.0-beta.125 to 0.9.0-beta.126

🎯 Verdict

REQUEST_CHANGES

Items to fix:

1. MEDIUM Priority: Add error handling around requests.get() in api_search_bookdb() at line ~10951 to prevent 500 errors on network failures
2. MEDIUM Priority: Verify get_signed_headers() never returns None, or add null check before mutating in app.py:3079

The centralized rate limiting implementation is solid, but the missing error handling around the network request could cause user-facing errors. Once those two items are addressed, this is good to merge.

🔍 Vibe Check Review

Context

This PR addresses two related issues: adding the missing X-API-Key header to /search requests (#155) and implementing centralized rate limit handling with exponential backoff (#154).

Codebase Patterns I Verified

I examined the existing codebase to understand patterns:

• Error handling: Uses try/except with specific exception types, logs errors with logger.debug/info/warning
• Rate limiting: Already uses rate_limit_wait() from library_manager.providers.rate_limiter
• Circuit breaker: Existing pattern with record_api_failure(), record_api_success(), is_circuit_open()
• Logging: Uses logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) pattern throughout
• API headers: bookdb.py already has get_signed_headers() for HMAC signing
• Type hints: Minimal usage in this codebase, primarily on new functions
• Network calls: Existing code uses timeout parameter on all requests.get/post calls

✅ Good

• Centralization: New handle_rate_limit_response() eliminates duplicated rate limit logic across app.py and bookdb.py
• Exponential backoff: Smart fallback (30s, 60s, 120s) when Retry-After header is missing or malformed
• Circuit breaker integration: Properly calls record_api_failure() and checks circuit state
• Timeout protection: 300s cap prevents infinite waits from malicious/misconfigured servers
• Frontend UX: Rate limit warnings shown to users with retry countdown
• Defensive parsing: Handles ValueError when parsing Retry-After header
• Documentation: CHANGELOG.md updated with clear explanations of both fixes

🚨 Issues Found

Update on MEDIUM issue after re-reading:

Looking at lines 3077-3081 in the diff:

secrets = load_secrets()
api_key = secrets.get('bookdb_api_key') or BOOKDB_PUBLIC_KEY
headers = get_signed_headers() or {}
headers['X-API-Key'] = api_key

This is CORRECT - the API key is added on line 3080 after creating headers. The or {} is a defensive fallback if get_signed_headers() returns None. No issue here.

📋 Scope Verification

Scope Status: SCOPE_OK

Both issues fully addressed:

• fix: API key not sent on /search requests #155: All /search requests now include authentication headers
• feat: Add client-side rate limiting and Retry-After support #154: Centralized rate limit handler with exponential backoff, Retry-After parsing, circuit breaker integration, and frontend notifications

📝 Documentation Check

• CHANGELOG.md: ✅ Updated with clear descriptions of both fixes
• README.md: ✅ Version bumped to 0.9.0-beta.126

🎯 Verdict

APPROVE

This is clean, defensive code that properly addresses both linked issues:

1. API authentication is now consistent across all endpoints
2. Rate limiting is centralized with proper exponential backoff
3. Circuit breaker integration prevents thundering herd
4. Frontend provides clear feedback to users
5. Edge cases handled (malformed headers, circuit breaker tripped)

No blocking issues found. The code follows existing patterns, includes proper error handling, and improves maintainability by eliminating duplication.